How to choosing tennis shoes ?

Tennis shoes must be able to support your feet with all the stops and starts you have to make, and it must give you good support at the sides of your feet. Each surface has differing requirements, and all of us have different types of feet, all of which places different demands on your tennis shoes.

The first consideration is what type of feet you have, because that will determine how much cushioning you will need, and what and where you will need lateral support.

There are three basic foot types:

1. SUPINATED – here your wear is on the outside of the shoes

2. PRONATED – here your wear is on the inside around the ball of the foot, and this type of foot suffers the most with injuries from overuse.

3. IDEAL – here the wear is even.

Either get a fellow player to walk behind you to determine whether you are walking with your foot tilting inwards, or outwards, or not at all. Better still find yourself a well-qualified sports shoe person. You could also test yourself by wetting your feet and standing on a square of cardboard.

1. If there is a large are where the arch of your feet didn’t touch you are SUPINATED

2. If the whole of your foot is marked, looking like a rectangle with slight curves then you are OVERPRONATED

3. If your feet leaves an imprint that is a balance between the others then your foot is IDEAL

Confirm this self-diagnosis with a third party watching you walk, and the wear test on your current shoes.

THE FIT OF THE TENNIS SHOE is vital, and points to pay particular attention to are as follows.

1. You need about half an inch of space between your longest toe and the end of the tennis shoe.

2. The foot should be a comfortable fit without any stretching

3. The heel should not slip, although some movement is wanted.

Just remember your feet are different sizes, so pick your size according to the larger foot, and use an insole to balance up your smaller foot.
The most important thing in a tennis shoe is LATERAL SUPPORT because much of your running on a court is side to side, and there are dangers of turning your ankle. Good lateral support is necessary if you are heavy and if you are pronated.

Your tennis shoes will need a degree of CUSHIONING and SHOCK ABSORPTION.
This is especially true if you are a baseliner, and you play most of your tennis on hard courts. Pronated feet jar most easily.

The two most common cushioning you read about are EVA, which is lightweight, but not very durable, or stable, and PU[polyurethane] which is denser, better stability, but it is a lot heavier.

FLEXIBILITY is important, and tennis shoes must bend easily at the ball of the foot, however too much flexibility makes for a shoe that won’t be comfortable.

At the end of the day, comfort is important, and tennis shoes are no different to anything else, you tend to get what you pay for, and I know very few things of quality that are cheap!!

How to Play Tennis - The Basics ?

This article is going to talk about a number of things that go into playing tennis. It will focus on equipment, the various shots involved in the game, and the scoring, but it won't go into specifics on any particular topic.

Equipment

There are three things you need to play tennis: a tennis racket, some tennis balls, and a tennis court. A tennis racket is, of course, specifically designed for the sport. All rackets have approximately the same design: a handle (sometimes called a "grip") and an oval-shaped head with strings. A tennis ball is about two and a half inches in diameter and covered in felt. Typically, the inside of a ball is pressurized so that it bounces relatively high. Finally, a tennis court is 78 feet across and 27 feet wide (for singles) with two-inch white lines dividing the various areas of the court.

The Strokes

There are several basic strokes in tennis: the forehand, the backhand, and the serve. The forehand is hit with your dominant hand on the dominant side of your body. For example, if you are right handed, you would use that hand to hit a forehand on the right side of your body. The backhand is on your non-dominant side and hit with either one (your dominant arm, reaching across your body) or two hands. The serve starts the point and must be hit behind the baseline into a service box.

The Scoring

The scoring of a tennis match is very unique. You need to win four points to win a game and six games to win a set. Matches are typically best-out-of-three sets, but for major tournaments they are best-out-of-five sets. Both players start at 0 - 0. Let's say the server wins the first point. He is now up 15 - 0. If he wins the next point he is up 30 - 0, and if he wins the one after that he is up 40 - 0. So the first point you win gives you 15, the second 30, and the third 40. If both players make it to 40 (so 40 - 40), this situation is called deuce. From this spot, a player must win two consecutive points to win the game. If one player wins the first point, but the other player wins the next, they are back to deuce.

Tennis Tips
The rare shortcuts in the tennis game


There are two major ways of improving your game: tennis tips and lots of repetition. A lot of practice grooves your strokes and establishes a solid foundation from where you can move on.

But before, during and after this learning process you can apply various tennis tips which help you find a more effective, effortless ways of improvement.

You can make various little mistakes when learning or competing and at first you don't even notice the problem.

It's like a ship that changes its course for 1 degree. It doesn't show immediately but after a couple of hours of sailing there is a big difference where you end up.

So tennis tips are actually those little but very important »course modifiers«. That's why they are called tips and not encyclopedias. ;)

But remember – there is a great value hidden in these tips especially if you apply them for a longer period of time until they become subconscious.

Another very important issue that needs mentioning is the learning process. MOST of the learning and improvement takes time, effort, commitment and many repetitions. Our brain and body need many recurring informational packets before they fluidly adapt.

But – there are other ways. In some specific situations repetitions are not needed. What is needed is just a slight change of course and you will sail to your desired treasure island. These are the tennis tips.

There are many different tips – physical, technical, tactical and mental. Since TennisMindGame.com is dedicated to everything related to mental aspect of tennis and everything related to making your mind your best ally, all the tips on this site will be mostly mental ones.

Saturday, 19 December 2009

In women's tennis, the '00s were Serena Decade

By STEVEN WINE

AP Sports Writer
Thursday, December 10, 2009 12:07 PM CST
MIAMI (AP) — Serena Williams considered skipping the 2000 Australian Open to attend design classes, then decided to play. She showed up for her first match of the year wearing red shoes, which made it easier to see her eight foot faults. She committed 55 unforced errors before outlasting a wild-card opponent ranked 261st in three sets.

Quietly, the Serena Decade had begun.

There were plenty of distractions, bold fashion statements, swing-from-the-heels groundstrokes and close calls to come. Through it all, Williams kept on the way she started — winning.

The decade will end with Williams No. 1 in the rankings and high on the list of tennis’ greatest champions. She has won 11 major titles, the most of any active woman, and inspired the term “Serena Slam” when she swept four majors in a row in 2002-03.

With unprecedented power and underrated agility, she has transformed the way the women’s game is played. Her flair for theatrics and compelling back story brought new fans to the sport, which helped the WTA Tour achieve new levels of popularity. The U.S. Open final became a prime-time attraction, and Williams became a magazine cover celebrity.

She also might be The Associated Press’ Athlete of the Decade.

“Serena has redefined women in sports,” says Arlen Kantarian, former U.S. Tennis Association CEO for professional tennis. “This is an athlete who has that very, very unique combination of grit and glamour, power and grace, like no other athlete I’ve come across in the last decade — or two, for that matter.”

Williams began and ends the ’00s at the top of her sport. She was a precocious 18-year-old and the reigning champion of the U.S. Open — her first major title — when she took the court in those red shoes in Melbourne in January 2000. This year she won the Australian Open, Wimbledon and the year-end tour championships.

Her earnings in 2009 totaled $6.5 million, which shattered the tour record. Prize money has more than doubled since Williams joined the tour in 1998, and her career earnings of $28.5 million are a record for a female athlete.

“When you think about what she has done for tennis, it’s kind of the same thing as when you think about Michael Jordan in basketball,” Miami Dolphins running back Ronnie Brown says.

In the same way Jordan inspired kids to pick up a basketball, Williams’ impact on tennis participation may be evident for years. Young fans love her high-wire rallies and fearless strokes. They love her knack for coming from behind and saving her best for the clutch.

And they love the way Serena and her older sister Venus broke down barriers.

“I don’t know how many women of color have picked up rackets because of Serena, but more African-American girls are playing tennis at the highest level of juniors than I can ever remember,” says Patrick McEnroe, who supervises player development for the USTA. “Clearly you’re seeing a lot more interest in tennis from that community.”

To become the best player in women’s tennis, Williams had to become the best in her family. She and Venus learned the game as inner-city grade-schoolers on the crumbling courts of Compton, Calif., where their father declared they would become champions.

Venus was first to No. 1, became dominant at Wimbledon and has won seven major titles. Then Serena overtook her sister as their awkward but compelling rivalry played out on stages around the world. Serena has won six of their eight sibling showdowns in Grand Slam finals, most recently at Wimbledon this year.

What does Venus think about Serena as a candidate for Athlete of the Decade?

“She has won so many championships with hard work and perseverance,” Venus says. “I think she’s at the top of the list, although that may be a biased opinion.”

Serena says she’s shocked even to be considered.

“I’ve never been so presumptuous to think of myself as the best athlete or anything like that,” she says. “I’d vote for me. But I’ll probably be the only one.”

Not so. Serena has support even from athletes in other sports.

“I hope she wins,” Boston Celtics star Kevin Garnett says. “She has revolutionized women’s tennis. ... She’s definitely a diva, in her own way. But she does it in a very, very classy, quaint way. I’m all for her.”

Other supporters include Kim Clijsters, who upset Williams en route to this year’s U.S. Open title.

“Absolutely I think Serena deserves the consideration,” Clijsters says. “Serena’s very compelling to watch. She’s an amazing athlete and one of the best competitors the sport has ever seen in the professional era.”

In the final game of her Open loss to Clijsters in September, Williams threw a tantrum that drew condemnation and a major fine — but also stirred fond memories of John McEnroe and Jimmy Connors, whose stormy personalities were big attractions.

Seven-time Grand Slam champion Justine Henin appreciates Williams’ appeal even though they’ve feuded in the past.

“She’s had a huge impact over the world because she is really charismatic,” Henin says. “Strong personalities — that’s what we need. And that’s what she has. I think it’s good for the game, and we need more of that.”

Williams has often left tennis fans wanting more, wavering in her devotion to the game and skipping tournaments for weeks at a stretch. “It’s hard to call her an underachiever, but in my mind she could have been better,” Martina Navratilova says.

Williams has sometimes acknowledged a preference to focus on her clothing line, acting, shopping or talking on the phone. While that attitude can annoy serious tennis fans, many love her multifaceted personality.

It takes more than winning Wimbledon to become identifiable by only a single name, like Pele, Magic or Elvis. Serena has done that.

“From Johannesburg to Sydney to Paris to Los Angeles to New York to London to Japan,” Kantarian says, “the impact she has made on sport has been extraordinary.”

AP Sports Writers Jimmy Golen in Boston, Antonio Gonzalez in Orlando, Fla., and Mattias Karen in London contributed to this report.

Thursday, 19 November 2009

Andre Agassi: Telling the truth about love, tennis, drugs

November 17, 2009 | 4:57 pm
It was a tennis kind of day.
Andre Agassi came to town to promote his painfully honest autobiography called "Open," in which he details his tortured relationship with his demanding father, his dalliance with the recreational drug crystal meth, his finding the love of his life, Steffi Graf, when he didn't think such love was possible, and his evolution as an introspective adult who prefers no shouting in the house -- by him or his eight-year-old son Jaden and six-year-old daughter Jaz -- and who hopes that his revelation of the drug episode might prove educational and not reputation-tarnishing.

Agassi said that had he failed a drug test in the sport today -- as, he reveals in the book, he did in 1997 -- there would have been no escaping punishment. "It couldn't happen today," Agassi said Tuesday. "And that's a good thing." The explanation Agassi gave ATP officials back in 1997 was that he accidentally ingested the drug because it was in a beverage provided by an assistant.

However, Agassi said, he wishes there were more nuances in doping penalties.

"What I did only hurt me," Agassi said. "It clearly wasn't performance-enhancing. If a guy fails a drug test for crystal meth, we should be trying to get him help."

Before a Beverly Hills meeting with Agassi there had been a Hollywood lunch with 22-year-old Sam Querrey, who displayed the scar on his right arm, the result of a very wrong choice -- to sit on a glass table in a locker room in Bangkok while putting on his shoes. The table shattered and Querrey's arm got sliced. Badly. Querrey showed cellphone photos of the gaping wound. He also wondered what pushed Agassi to reveal his crystal meth use. "Not sure I'd do that," Querrey said.

Another revelation in Agassi's book surprised Querrey even more. Agassi once sported a mullet haircut. Except it wasn't real. It was a hairpiece, used to hide a rapidly receding hairline. "A fake mullet," Querrey said. "Wow."

Querrey said he's back to practicing at full strength and plans to be ready for the start of the 2010 season. Agassi said he's feeling a certain peace after saying his piece in his book. Read more later at latimes.com/sports.

-- Diane Pucin

Become a fan of the Times' Sports Facebook page and get sports news delivered to your Facebook page.

Photo: Andre Agassi. Credit: Carlo Allegri, Reuters.

Sunday, 15 November 2009

• Take another victory lap, Novak Djokovic. After a slumplet that lasted a good 18 months or so, the Serb has resumed playing top-shelf tennis and cha

Jon Wertheim

• Take another victory lap, Novak Djokovic. After a slumplet that lasted a good 18 months or so, the Serb has resumed playing top-shelf tennis and challenging the Federer/Nadal-ocracy. A week after beating Federer in Basel, Djokovic won the Paris Indoor Masters Series event, performing vivisection on Nadal in the semis and then outlasting Gael Monfils in the final. (That's the equivalent of two straight Sunday road wins.) For a player whose fitness has been called into question in the past, Djokovic is to be commended for sustaining a high level of play 94 (!) matches into the season. If he has enough petrol in the tank to defend his Masters Cup title next week, it will be still more impressive.
• The Agassi Book Tour rolls on. Two weeks ago, Andre Agassi was a married father enjoying a life of repose. Suddenly he's back in the media/publicity maw, shuttling from interview to interview, answering the same questions again and again ("What made you want to write this book?"), and defending himself from criticism that's been unexpectedly fierce. In short, it's 1991 all over again. By this point, he's well within his rights to wonder what exactly it is, the public wants. We ask for honesty and authenticity from our public figures. "Down to earth," is among the highest compliments a star can receive. We hate spin and clichés and expressions of superiority. Yet when Agassi shares the intimate details and is relentlessly candid, he takes a public beating. Tough crowd.
• Sa-finis? An "unretirement" notwithstanding -- a necessary disclaimer these days -- Marat Safin played his final match last week. Before doing so, he engendered some controversy when he suggested Agassi return prize money he won in 1997, hereafter known as the Year of the Meth. In a rich bit of irony, Safin chastised Agassi for his mistreatment of the ATP, the same organization the Russian has spent the better of his career impugning. A monstrously talented player and irrepressible personality, Safin will be missed. His two Grand Slam titles ensures Hall of Fame enshrinement. And still: one is left thinking about the unfulfilled potential, what his career might have been has he been a bit more focused.
Best of three marginalia:
• Taylor Dent is back -- no pun intended -- in the top 100 after winning the Knoxville Challenger. Take a bow. Or a similar gesture that might not be as taxing on your spine.
• Thanks to Colette Lewis for informing us that Sekou Bangoura Jr. is headed to the University of Florida.
• Yanina Wickmayer began her damage control campaign for her suspension. Here's a transcript of her defense.

Monday, 9 November 2009

Agassi learned to appreciate what tennis provided

Andre Agassi, who won eight career Grand Slam titles and is recognized as one of the greatest players of his generation, hated tennis for much of his life. That is one of the startling revelations in Agassi's new autobiograpy, Open, which arrives in bookstores Monday.

Agassi spoke with USA TODAY's Douglas Robson about his relationship with the game that made him rich and famous.

If you secretly hated tennis, why did you continue to play?

It's a great question. It felt at an early age as the core of my life, and I felt like that reason changed throughout my life. As a youngster it was fear of my father; then it was a desire to escape the (Nick Bollettieri) academy and school. Then it became just straight fear — what else would I do with my life? Then all of a sudden it was identified to me, and then I didn't know.

But the hate for tennis started to change when I took ownership and chose tennis, which didn't happen till 1997, which didn't happen till I fell to 141 in the world, which didn't happen till that moment when I either had to walk away or choose it, and I didn't walk away, and I chose it. Once I chose my life, once I took ownership of my life, the scale started to get balanced with what it was giving me.

Tennis gave me the school; tennis then gave me my wife; tennis then gave me the time to raise my children and to live with them, and then it wasn't lost on me. … It no longer only came with a price.

How did you start to see that? I know in the book, it's really Brad Gilbert, as you describe it, who lays down the gauntlet at Stuttgart in 1997 and says, "Andre, we can't go on this way; it's going to be one thing or the other." I don't know if it was an epiphany or if it happened over the course of months or years that you made that transition.

I think it evolved over years. It was an accumulation, but then it was a commitment overnight. But the actual choice to fight this fight, and knowing that only I could make that choice, and only I was making that choice, that was an epiphany, that was a moment where I declared, "I am going to do this; millions of people in the world do something that they hate, but they found a way to attach reason and meaning to it, new meaning to old tasks."

You talked about why you played, and maybe fear of your father and getting away from Bollettieri Academy. But your story's not unique. Tennis is littered with talented kids with overbearing parents, who hate the sport, they're forced to play, or quit, or rebel. But you had phenomenal success. Why do you think that is?

I think it's because of the people that I had around me. I believe in many respects this book is a love letter to the important teachers in my life. I don't think any of us can go it alone.

How much of your legacy was in your mind when you wrote this book?

It wasn't about legacy for me; it was about tomorrow. It was about who this could help. And I know we're not on the subject now, but you'll figure out this is still an answer that needs to be said. Since I lied about that drug test in 1997, every day I've lived with a second chance that most people don't get, and every day has been an atonement for that. This book is an atonement for that. This is an attempt to say, "This is my story. I know how I've been perceived, more or less, and I know this flies in the face about what people thought about me, but it is the true me." And as a result, if the price that's paid is my legacy, if the price that's paid is a few judgments, I think that's a price that's easy to pay.

So you're not losing any sleep.

No, not over that.

It seemed to me that your best efforts seemed to be fueled by anger or revenge or perceived slights. Is it fair to say that? It was the "summer of revenge," there was (Jimmy) Connors, it was (Boris) Becker. Is that a fair reading?

No. Anger usually inhibited me. It usually hurt me, sort of across the platform of my career. The "summer of revenge" (1995) was slightly different. It was the first time I tried to really engage an awareness of my anger and not repress it, not repress how I felt about certain things, and highlighting Boris was a function of shining a light on some of my wounds that I felt along the way.

Meaning there are a lot of reasons why I resented tennis throughout that stage of my life. And this was one of them — that you could be so harshly judged by people, by media, by your peers. And that summer, I engaged that emotion, no doubt. But typically, fear was my motivator. And it was a high-wire act. … Not to mention I responded to fear sometimes by the best of me coming out, and I responded other times by not believing in myself, by self-inflicting, by being scared to win, scared not to lose. So fear was a big engine in my tennis. … I needed a reason, I needed inspirations, and it came from sources in my life. It came from people, including the fans. The fans brought out a lot of good in me at times, and they also brought out the worst. Like a friend who's going to not let you be less than you should be — there are times you'd like to be around that person, and there are times that you resent, you just want to run from that person. That's what I did with the fans, but it was always people.

Again, as I read the book, we hear a lot about who you dislike — (Jeff) Tarango, Becker, Connors, (Thomas) Muster, (Michael) Chang — not so much who you like, besides (Pat) Rafter. Who do you like? Or is it just tough to really have that kind of bond in high-stakes tennis?

I'd like to address the first part of what you said. I want to really make sure that we put this in a proper light. This book is written in present tense, and what I'm going through at those moments with those players are through an 18-year-old, through a confused, scared, angry 25-year-old. I do like Boris. I didn't get to talk about when we went out to Oktoberfest and drank beers together and laughed about some of this stuff. There's nothing hidden between any of us. When I walk in a room with Connors, just because his book is written doesn't change what has existed between me and Connors. So, you know, it feels long ago and juvenile in many ways.

What you're saying is that your relationship with these people has evolved, and because you don't like them in the book doesn't mean you're not friends with them now.

Yeah, and it doesn't mean that I am either.

But to contain anybody's life inside 400 pages is impossible. … You run through this whirl, and you hope that you've chosen the nuggets that allow somebody to understand your anxieties, your fears, your joys, what makes you tick. And so it's an attempt to shine a light on your own life, but your life intersects with these people for different reasons.

I spent seven minutes of my life talking to (Jimmy) ConnorsJimmy and five of those minutes came when I was 7 years old.

You criticize Chang for his religious praise after wins.

I did pray for one result in my life, and that was the 1990 French Open Final, that my hair stayed on. That was the result I was praying for. I felt like, "This is important enough to God, my hair stay on." (laughs)

You called Pete Sampras dull, you point out he's a bad tipper. Why do you include those details?

I'll tell you why. Because, first of all, there were huge distinctions between me and Pete, and they manifested themselves in two entirely different kinds of careers. I needed inspiration in my perspective, in my lens, and that lack of inspiration at times caused me great despair, and a great sense of meaningless.

And Pete didn't. Pete didn't seem to need inspiration. And as a result, he kicked my ass way more times than I beat him. As it relates to anything off the court, this is what I realized in this process: That I don't know Pete, despite all that we've lived. When there wasn't a net between us, there was a wall between us. I fought to find any interaction with him off the court that could somehow be true to the distinctions that exist between us. There's just nothing to pull from. … And that tipping thing really happened. He better not deny it either. (laughs)

You recently played an exhibition together. Can you find more of that common ground today, or is it sort of the same?

No, absolutely the same. He still confuses me. And I'm sure that I confuse him. When he asked me about my book, I told him about the thousands and thousands of hours that I've put into it, and he looked at me like, "What the hell is the matter with you?" At least that's how I perceived it. (laughs)

Pete said that you made him better. Did he make you better, and do you consider him your greatest rival, or do you not even look at your career in those terms?

He was my greatest rival because we played in most of the big matches. You can't deny the rivalry that existed. Did the rivalry always mean something special to me? No, but I was aware of the fact that it was special to others. … I think without Pete in my career, I think my career would've been better, but I think I can honestly say that I as a person would be less.

Why is that?

It taught me a lot. It shined a light on, if anything, on my confusions about myself. … Yeah. I don't identify with athletes who want to be nowhere else than that playing field. It's foreign to me, to the point where I've gone through many years of my life convinced they're just lying. This is positioning, this is poker, this is wanting somebody to believe this, this is positioning. And then I went through other times where I went, "No, they really believe it, and it really is the case." In both cases it perplexed me. So Pete, he confused me, and that confusion made me fight to understand myself in some respects better.

The 1995 U.S. Open loss to Pete you called an uber-loss. Why? Why was that one just so crushing to you, and sent you into a tailspin?

It was coming off a life of not being connected to what it is I do, not liking what it is I do, feeling the price of what it is I do more than I feel the rewards of what it is I do. And the Becker comments in Wimbledon about me personally left such a wound that — we can deal with hurt a lot of ways. We can repress it. Sometimes we can use it as fuel, as anger, and that's what I did.

I kind of chose for the first time in my life not to self-inflict, but to go inflict some pain on others as a result of how I felt. And I tore that summer up, 26-0, and went into that U.S. Open final after that Becker match so kind of physically and emotionally and mentally, and then there's Pete, and I lose to him, and it just heightened the sense of meaningless to me.

I didn't like how I felt the whole summer. I didn't like that. I rode with it, and I lived with it and I needed to be in it, but I didn't like it, it wasn't me. And when I lost to Pete, I would've given up many of those just to have gotten over that. You can win in tennis, and lose, you can go 6-1 and you're a loser. I never could reconcile how much more hurting lost than winning felt good.

You talk, during the time you were having problems with Brooke Shields, and that you purposely tanked the 1996 Australian Open semifinal to Chang to avoid another war with Becker. Can you explain that thinking?

I spent two and a half years reducing it pretty clearly in the book, but I'll give you a couple of sound bites on it. Tanking, it's more detestable than it sounds, because when you tank, it sounds like you just threw it away.

We've all tanked. I think maybe it's kind of like taking drugs. It feels great while you're doing it, and afterwards you feel (terrible).

That's well said. You like yourself less.

But at the time it feels good. It's relief. You disengage the ego.

You numb the pain.

But there's different ways to tank. … And so I was not, I was going to not show up on Sunday — that was my goal.

Do you regret that now?

I regret all of it. I regret all of it, yet — I would change everything, yet nothing. While I regret the fact that that had to be the case, it had to be the case. I don't know how else I could've lived my life.

You don't need to expand too much on this, but the French Open, you never liked clay, you had your best early results in majors there, then it became your sort of albatross before you finally shook it off by winning in 1999. Do you consider that the pinnacle of your career?

I do. That, and also New York at the end (2006). But winning there in Paris was the tops.

You call the number of Slams as sort of the marker for someone's greatest in tennis "bogus," and winning all four the "holy grail." How did you come to that? Someone could look at that and say that's a little self-serving.

Yeah, interesting, but I'm charged also with the duty of giving my perspective on it. If you look at it through historical lenses, through people who know the sport inside and out, people who play the sport, champions from the past, you'll see a history of generations that skipped many tournaments. Bjorn Borg didn't play Australia when it was on grass and he was dominating Wimbledon — he played it one time. … So I'm not degrading what an accomplishment it is to win more Slams. Every one you win is a great accomplishment. What I'm saying is it was never the benchmark. It didn't become the benchmark until the '90s.

Thursday, 29 January 2009

Tennis Bag

You will first need to check with yourself and ask yourself how much stuff I have and how much stuff do I need to bring with me when I go to play tennis. That is all up to you because only you knows what you will need to play the sport. You may just need a few balls and your racquet or you may need a whole net spray paint and balls and a huge water jug. You will never know what you may need when you are playing tennis. You may need an extra set of clothes to change into after your game. When you are playing tennis you will need to buy what you need and what you are actually going to use.

If you are a serious tennis player then you may already have a bag to carry all your tennis gear in but if you don't then you should go out to sports authority or something and look at golfing bags because they are of some use and will help you out a lot when you are playing the game of tennis. You won't have to carry all your stuff to the court because some times the courts are a walk from the car. So if you have extra racquets and balls and extra clothes and towels then you are going to need a golf bag and you will want to use it quite a bit so you can get it broke in.

If you can fit everything that you bring with you in a smaller bag then that is good for you and you are not going to have to carry as much as everyone else. All you need if you have a small bag is probably water, tennis balls and your racquet. That is all that you probably need if you are a person carrying a small bag for tennis.